Thursday, January 26, 2012

Announcements for the January 23 Faculty Meeting


1)  Writing Center

If you have students who need help with writing, encourage them to see Betty Spence in the Writing Center. Her office is on the 2nd floor above the library, adjacent to the computer labs. Hours are MW 10-5, TR 10:30-1:00, 2:30-5:30. It is important for students to seek help early in the writing process, not at the last minute before a paper is due.

2)  Academic Counseling

If any faculty have recommendations for students to attend Academic Counseling sessions in which students are given assistance with time management, study skills, and self-advocacy, please have them send me an email.  We are doing the scheduling and oversight of attendance through student affairs.  I welcome faculty input on this effort! --Susie Miller

For more information, or to recommend a student, please contact Susan Miller: smiller@mac.edu


3) VISITING ARTISTS  
7.00 pm in Callicott Auditorium 

* Downing Pryor Lecture
Tuesday, February 7
Mel Chin 
Conceptual artist
  
* Tuesday, February 14
Jeanine Jablonsk
Gallerist / curator, Owner, Fourteen 30 Contemporary Gallery, Portland OR

* Thursday, February 23
Chris Irick
Jeweler
Tributaries artist at the Metal Museum


4) WEDNESDAY LUNCHTIME LECTURE 
12.10 to 12.50 pm in Myers Auditorium

February 29
Bill Price
North American Goldsmith’s Conference, San Francisco, CA


5) EXHIBITIONS  
RUST HALL: MAIN AND ALUMNI GALLERIES

Cross Currents                                                      
Main
Curated by Jennifer Sargent
Feb 17 – March 25

Erin Morrison                                                               
Alumni
February 17 – April 1
Reception Friday, February 17, 5 – 7 pm

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Links for Faculty Committees at Other Institutions

EXAMPLES OF COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY COMMITTEES

Baylor University || Faculty Handbook || University Committees
MIT Faculty Resources | 1.70 Committees
Morehead State University - Faculty Handbook: Ch 5
Standing Committees | University of Missouri
University Standing Committees
Standing Committees - College of The Arts - University of South Florida

MONTSERRAT FACULTY HANDBOOK

http://www.montserrat.edu/images/Faculty_Handbook_2011-12.pdf

EXAMPLES OF COMMITTEE CHARGES

Charge to the Committee on Research (RPH 1.2)
Committee Charges : Rice University
Standing Committee Charges
Charge to Committee on Academic Affairs, Faculty Senate, U.Va.

Final Agenda, January 13 Faculty Meeting

FINAL AGENDA
Faculty Meeting
DA Media
Friday, January 13, 2012, 1:30 p.m.



1. Call to Order

2. Approval of Minutes from December 16, 2011

3. Committee Reports are suspended for this meeting

3. Old Business

·      Discussion of committee structure at Memphis College of Art, including, but not limited to, examination of:
Standing Committees
Ad Hoc Committees
Committee elections, terms, and term limits
Committee charges
Committee documentation requirements (minutes, reports)
Committee reporting duties and requirements

·      Discussion of faculty meetings, including, but not limited to, examination of:
Definitions of the faculty body, quorum, faculty representative, and faculty recorder
Rules of procedure
Voting procedure
Necessity of committee reports and other reports/alternative methods of reporting to the faculty


Note from the Faculty Representative:
I intend that these discussions will have tangible outcomes.  The goals for this semester are:
1) to redefine faculty shared governance through a redesigned committee system,
2) to define a list of standing faculty committees, including membership, operating procedures, charge, and duties,
3) to rewrite the handbook prose on standing faculty committees (and possibly also ad hoc committees and other college committees),
4) to begin the process of shepherding these changes through the Policy on Policies procedures.


4.  New Business

·                          Motion to accept QEP plan
·                          Motion to remove Studio Foundations from General Education

5. Motion to Adjourn

            

Committees, Faculty Handbook 2011-2012, with highlighting

·      Faculty Committees

All committee membership will be appointed by the VPAA/Dean and reviewed annually, at a late-spring faculty meeting.  Minimum membership is noted below.

Standing Committees of the Faculty
  • Committee on Committees - Faculty body.
  • Admissions – Reviews applicants to the undergraduate program.  Membership:  Three F-T faculty, Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services and admissions counselors.
  • Curriculum - Reviews proposals for new courses or substantive changes to existing courses and/or programs.  See curriculum development procedures on page D - 5. Membership: The appropriate Department Head, Division Chair(s), and the VPAA/Dean.  Secretary/record keeper will be chosen from within the committee.  For the purpose of continuity, at least one member of the committee will continue to serve through the following year. The VPAA/Dean will respond, in writing, on all proposals received, and the action taken.  An annual log of deliberations and actions will be maintained.
  • Digital Media – Guides the acquisition of digital technology to serve the curriculum.  Membership: Director of Institutional Technology, Instructional Technology Associate, Academic Affairs Coordinator, interested F-T & P-T faculty, and a student representative.
  • Exhibitions/ Visiting Artists - Will oversee the visiting artist and exhibition programs for the academic year.  Membership:  Director of Exhibitions and Lectures, Director of MFA Programs, Faculty Representative, Vice President for College Advancement and VPAA/Dean.
  • Faculty Enrichment – Reviews applications for professional support funds. (refer to Faculty Development section page E - 28)
  • Gallery Will assist in the hanging and installation exhibits for MCA's galleries for the academic year.  Membership:  Ten F-T faculty members and Work Study assistants.
  • Health and Safety – Establishes and enforces policies and procedures for the safe operation of all academic facilities.
  • Institutional Effectiveness – Reviews assessment initiatives. Membership: Dean’s Council.
  • Library – Oversee the acquisition of periodicals and books.  Membership: Library Director, Visual Resources Curator, LAS Chair and four F-T faculty (including both studio and Liberal Studies).
  • Scholarships and Awards - Will meet in the late spring to make decisions on the annual merit scholarships, fellowships and awards for the next academic year.  Membership: Dean’s Advisory Council.


Ad Hoc Committees
  • Advancement Committee– Reviews all candidates applying for advancement in rank (promotion). Membership: undergraduate division chairs or their appointees, a graduate program director or his/her appointee (at the discretion of the VPAA/Dean), one F-T faculty member elected by the faculty at-large, and one F-T faculty member appointed by the President. The committee shall elect its chair. The majority of the committee members must hold the academic rank to which the candidate(s) is applying. Committee members may not serve in any year in which the member is a candidate for advancement. In such a case, the VPAA/Dean will select an alternative.  When the number of faculty eligible for appointment to the Advancement Committee is, in the judgment of the faculty or the President, so few that a different appointment procedure should be followed or a smaller Advancement Committee should be appointed, then either the faculty or the President may propose to the Academic Affairs committee of the board that a different procedure be followed and the Academic Affairs committee may so authorize. (refer to Advancement in Rank section, page E - 18)
  • Faculty Review Committee – Conducts peer component of periodic faculty reappointment reviews. Membership: the Division Chair (or divisional faculty elected substitute), one F-T faculty member elected by the faculty at-large, and one F-T faculty member appointed by the VPAA/Dean. (refer to Faculty Review section, page E - 19)
  • Faculty Grievance — Will represent individual faculty members in school-related complaints.
  • Faculty Search - Will work in conjunction with administration on the search for new faculty. Active search committees will provide updates during faculty meetings. Search Committee Membership:  faculty members who will best represent the specialties, interests and objectives of the relevant discipline. It may also include a trustee appointed by the Board, if the Board so chooses. (refer to Faculty Searches, Appointments and Academic Rank section page E - 11.)
  • Part-time Faculty - Will meet to consider concerns of the part-time faculty. Membership: three part-time instructors and one full-time instructor.


Special Committees
  • Retention Committee –Works to serve College-wide retention initiatives. Membership by presidential appointment, generally including three F-T faculty members.

Library Committee Self Study


Name of Committee:  Library Committee

Current Committee Members (please indicate chair and any other officers): 

Maria Bibbs
Ellen Daugherty
Maritza Davila
Adrian Duran (Chair)
Soyoung Park
Joel Priddy
Leslie Holland
Ian Sterling

Part 1:  MCA Faculty Handbook Description

1) The 2011-2012 MCA Handbook includes the following description of the Committee:

Library Oversee the acquisition of periodicals and books. Membership: Library Director, Visual Resources Curator, LAS Chair and four F-T faculty (including both studio and Liberal Studies.)


2a) In the opinion of the committee, does the handbook description accurately describe the function, purpose, and membership of the committee? Please explain.


Yes, but not really.  The committee has taken it upon itself to exist as an advisory body in all things related to the Library.  Acquisition is one facet of this.  Facilities, staff, IT, and long-term planning have been added to these.


2b) Please suggest changes/edits/rewrites for the Handbook description of your committee.  If the Handbook does not currently include a description for your committee, please write one. (Answers to this section of the self-study are suggestions only. They are intended to help the faculty move toward Handbook revisions, but they should be regarded as draft versions at this stage. Please don’t spend an inordinately long time trying to craft the perfect description—they can be changed and edited as we go through the process.)


Library—The Library Committee oversees the direction and resources of the MCA Library.  The Committee advises the Librarian and the MCA Administration in matters related to the MCA Library.  Membership: Librarian, Visual Resources Curator, four F-T faculty (including both studio and Liberal Studies), and a representative from IT.

Part 2:  Committee Charge, Duties, and Goals

1) Does the committee operate under a clearly stated committee “charge” (that is, a statement of purpose explaining what the committee is charged with doing on behalf of the faculty or college—this may be different from the catalog description of the committee)?  Is this charge written down and made available to the members of the committee and the college community at large?  Please explain. (If you feel that the current catalog description or any revision to the description that you made above functions adequately as a charge, please say so).



No.



2) Does the committee maintain a set of specific duties? Are these written down? If a set of such duties exists (written down or in the minds of the chair or other members of the committee), please list them here.  (In other words, what is the committee specifically responsible for? What does the committee do?)



No, the duties of the committee respond to the needs of the Library and the submissions made to the Committee by the larger MCA community.



3) Does the committee have a set of goals (short and/or long-term)? If so, please list them and briefly explain the process the committee used to arrive at these goals.


Yes.  To advise the Librarian and the Administration on Library matters and long-term planning for the Library.  And to induce action.



4) Other than verbal reports at faculty meetings, does the committee make reports in verbal or written form to the faculty or administration? How often are these reports made? Where are written reports housed and are they available to other members of the college community?


Yes, the Library Committee submitted its report in January 2011.  This may have been the first of its sort.  This is still an active report, and should be integrated into the Strategic Plan.  Otherwise, there is no formal schedule of written report submission.  All Library Committee endeavors are available to the MCA community on request.



5) Please add any additional comments about the charge, duties, and goals of the committee.


Part 3:  Committee Membership

1a) To the best of the committee’s knowledge, how are faculty members of the currently committee chosen?

Appointed by Dean.


1b) If it is not explicitly stated in the description/rules/by-laws of the committee, how do you think the members of the committee should be chosen?

It would be advantageous to have representation from ArtEd.  The committee membership should be determined in consultation with the Librarian.


2a) Do the faculty members on the committee have limited terms of service?


No.


2b) If it is not explicitly stated in the description/rules/by-laws of the committee, should there be terms of service? Please explain.


No.


3) Does the current committee membership structure make sense? Is the committee too big, too small, the right size?  Please explain.



Seems fine.


4a) Does the committee as it currently exists have faculty members from each of the Divisions of the College?  If so, do you feel (or is it a requirement of the committee) that it always have representation from each of the Divisions? 



No grad or design arts representation.  Otherwise, studio, LS, and staff are represented.

4b) If the Committee does not include members from each Division, should it? Please explain.

We would benefit from membership that includes at least one practitioner of the digital arts.



5a) If there are administrators on the committee (according to Dean Strickland’s committee grid), explain their role(s).

No.


5b) If administrators are members of the committee, do you feel that their roles are necessary? In other words, does the committee feel that administrators should be members of the committee? Please explain.

The committee does not necessarily consider administrative presence necessary, however there is some belief that administrative presence might increase administrative attention and response.


6a) If there are staff members on the committee, explain their role(s).

Yes, Ian.  He is our IT expert and otherwise participates as do other members.


6b) If staff are members of the committee, do you feel that their roles are necessary to the successful functioning of the committee?  Please explain.

Yes, having Ian has been a great help.


7) To what extent are the decisions of your committee autonomous? In other words, do you make decisions that do not go to the full faculty for approval? Or do you make recommendations that then must be approved by the faculty or others?  Please explain.

Our decision making is autonomous.  The execution of actions related to those decisions is entirely dependent upon elements beyond the Committee.  That is where we often falter.


8) Please add any additional comments related to membership, committee structure, the appointment or election of members, participation of non-faculty members, etc.




Part 4: Committee Meetings and Time Commitment

1a) On average, how many times per semester does your committee meet?  Please indicate if the number of meetings varies by semester and explain why.

Usually 2 meetings, but more have occurred when needed.

1b) Is there a set meeting schedule (e.g., once monthly, bi-weekly, etc)?  If not, how does the committee determine if a meeting is necessary and who calls the meeting?

No.  We hold meetings as they become necessary.  The meetings can be called by any member of the Committee, though the Librarian or Chair most often do so.

1c) If there is no set meeting schedule, do you think that there should be a set meeting schedule or a minimum number of meetings for your committee per semester? Please explain.

No.  The obligations of the members are such that a set meeting time would be logistically unfeasible.


1d) How long is the average meeting?

1-1.5 hours.

2) In general, how many hours of commitment per semester does this committee require of members?


Varies.  Librarian does most work.  Chair does second most.  Members tend to distribute work equally amongst themselves.

3a) Does the committee take minutes, keep notes, or otherwise track and archive the activities of the committee?

Yes.


3b) If you do keep minutes, where are they housed? Can other faculty (or administrators) not on your committee look at these minutes easily?

Presently, Chair maintains minutes on his MCA computer.  They can be accessed upon request.


4) Please add any additional comments on committee meetings and the time commitment required of faculty on this committee.

Health and Safety Committee Self Study


Name of Committee: Health and Safety Committee

Current Committee Members (please indicate chair and any other officers): 

Elizabeth Brown
Maritza Davila
Susan Maakestad
Remy Miller
Haley Morris-Cafiero (Co-Chair)
Bill Price
Cynthia Thompson
Leandra Urrutia
Cathy Wilson
Ken Houk
Carla Ruffer
Jonathan Welden (Co-Chair)


Part 1:  MCA Faculty Handbook Description

1) The 2011-2012 MCA Handbook includes the following description of the Committee:

In the 2011-2012 MCA Handbook under the subheading “Standing Committees” (p. E10) the following description is available:

Health and Safety – Establishes and enforces policies and procedures for the safe operation of all academic facilities.


2a) In the opinion of the committee, does the handbook description accurately describe the function, purpose, and membership of the committee? Please explain.

The committee feels that the handbook description is in need of revision. The function is still on target, but the purpose should be updated to reflect where the college currently stands in regard to the use of safe practices, becoming more responsible environmentally, and how this may impact the community at large. In addition the composition of the committee needs to be addressed.


2b) Please suggest changes/edits/rewrites for the Handbook description of your committee.  If the Handbook does not currently include a description for your committee, please write one. (Answers to this section of the self-study are suggestions only. They are intended to help the faculty move toward Handbook revisions, but they should be regarded as draft versions at this stage. Please don’t spend an inordinately long time trying to craft the perfect description—they can be changed and edited as we go through the process.)

The Health and Safety Committee, composed of appropriate faculty and staff, is responsible for the establishment of policies and methods that promote safe and environmentally responsible practices both physically and pedagogically throughout MCA and within the Memphis community.

Part 2:  Committee Charge, Duties, and Goals

1) Does the committee operate under a clearly stated committee “charge” (that is, a statement of purpose explaining what the committee is charged with doing on behalf of the faculty or college—this may be different from the catalog description of the committee)?  Is this charge written down and made available to the members of the committee and the college community at large?  Please explain. (If you feel that the current catalog description or any revision to the description that you made above functions adequately as a charge, please say so).

During the past four years, the college actively sought to address issues of health and safety introduced in voluntary audits requested of EPA and OSHA. Although a formal college-wide committee did not meet, individual faculty worked together in their departments to resolve EPA and OSHA issues with the assistance of the Facilities Director and EPA Coordinator. These issues were also brought before the entire faculty at regularly scheduled faculty meetings and through email. The college is now compliant with these audits. At this time the committee would like to change it’s purpose and create additional goals that allow for the creation of new environmentally proactive policies, in addition to ensuring that MCA remains EPA and OSHA compliant.

2) Does the committee maintain a set of specific duties? Are these written down? If a set of such duties exists (written down or in the minds of the chair or other members of the committee), please list them here.  (In other words, what is the committee specifically responsible for? What does the committee do?)

In the past few years, the focus of the committee has been to help all faculty members maintain safe practices and also become compliant with EPA and OSHA guidelines on a voluntary basis. This was accomplished through emails, small group meetings, and faculty meeting announcements.  As the committee transitions to a larger group, duties will be more clearly delineated in early 2012.

3) Does the committee have a set of goals (short and/or long-term)? If so, please list them and briefly explain the process the committee used to arrive at these goals.

The Environmental Policy outlines a set of goals that the committee will begin to investigate ways of making each one happen.


4) Other than verbal reports at faculty meetings, does the committee make reports in verbal or written form to the faculty or administration? How often are these reports made? Where are written reports housed and are they available to other members of the college community?

No reports currently exist.  When the committee becomes more active, the reports will be kept in Jonathan Welden’s office.


5) Please add any additional comments about the charge, duties, and goals of the committee.

Part 3:  Committee Membership

1a) To the best of the committee’s knowledge, how are faculty members of the currently committee chosen?

The Dean and Faculty Representative presented last year’s Faculty Assignments at a faculty meeting on Sept. 15. The faculty voted to keep assignments consistent with the exception of changes needed to address new faculty and faculty who had left the college. It was agreed that most positions should be maintained. Current members of the committee were chosen as the people responsible for areas (studios, housing, woodshop) that have active engagement in handling, storing and/or disposing of hazardous materials. The faculty was asked for their input (Sept 15 email from Faculty Representative, Ellen Daugherty, and a new assignment grid for all committees was presented to the faculty via email from the Faculty Representative on Sept. 21.

1b) If it is not explicitly stated in the description/rules/by-laws of the committee, how do you think the members of the committee should be chosen?

Members should be chosen based on their working environments and their interest in the carbon reducing measures of the college.  Any broad EPA/OSHA policy changes are communicated to committee to be disseminated to their areas.


2a) Do the faculty members on the committee have limited terms of service?

Committee appointments are made yearly. However, most positions remain the same year-to year due to teaching assignments where specific faculty members are actively engaged in compliance with EPA and OSHA mandates.


2b) If it is not explicitly stated in the description/rules/by-laws of the committee, should there be terms of service? Please explain.

No.  As the engagement with hazardous materials requires compliance with certain laws and engagement with college community to insure college-wide management of the materials, the term of service for the members is not finite. 

3) Does the current committee membership structure make sense? Is the committee too big, too small, the right size?  Please explain.


At present the committee size appears to be appropriate to meet the needs of the college.  As the needs of the college change, the committee structure will be adapted.


4a) Does the committee as it currently exists have faculty members from each of the Divisions of the College?  If so, do you feel (or is it a requirement of the committee) that it always have representation from each of the Divisions? 

The committee does not currently have any faculty members from liberal studies or the design arts division. The committee will solicit interested faculty to join once goals and duties are clarified.


4b) If the Committee does not include members from each Division, should it? Please explain.

It is not necessary to have all divisions represented. However, additional members have the potential to better inform the committee on issues such as technology, grant writing or simply to bring a different perspective to the group.


5a) If there are administrators on the committee (according to Dean Strickland’s committee grid), explain their role(s).

There are no administrators on the committee.


5b) If administrators are members of the committee, do you feel that their roles are necessary? In other words, does the committee feel that administrators should be members of the committee? Please explain.

N/A

6a) If there are staff members on the committee, explain their role(s).

Director of Physical Plant, Jonathan Welden, is the Co-Chair of the committee, Carla Ruffer and Kenny Houk.

6b) If staff are members of the committee, do you feel that their roles are necessary to the successful functioning of the committee?  Please explain.

Yes.  All staff members involved are pivotal for success. Jonathan Welden is responsible for changes and maintenance to properties owned by the college and is therefore aware of current projects, budget and plans related to facilities. Jonathan also works with Haley Morris-Cafiero to stay up to date on EPA and OSHA regulations to guarantee MCA’s continued compliance. Kenny Houk is responsible for the shop and safety in this area is critical.  Carla Ruffer directs Student Life and student safety/ wellbeing are major concerns of her position.

7) To what extent are the decisions of your committee autonomous? In other words, do you make decisions that do not go to the full faculty for approval? Or do you make recommendations that then must be approved by the faculty or others?  Please explain.

MCA faculty, staff and students are currently in the process of reviewing policies related to health and safety.


8) Please add any additional comments related to membership, committee structure, the appointment or election of members, participation of non-faculty members, etc.

None.


Part 4: Committee Meetings and Time Commitment

1a) On average, how many times per semester does your committee meet?  Please indicate if the number of meetings varies by semester and explain why.

Committee meetings have been held once per semester. As the committee becomes more active, it is anticipated that meetings will be held 4 times per semester.



1b) Is there a set meeting schedule (e.g., once monthly, bi-weekly, etc)?  If not, how does the committee determine if a meeting is necessary and who calls the meeting?



1c) If there is no set meeting schedule, do you think that there should be a set meeting schedule or a minimum number of meetings for your committee per semester? Please explain.


1d) How long is the average meeting?

One hour.

2) In general, how many hours of commitment per semester does this committee require of members?

10-15 hours.


3a) Does the committee take minutes, keep notes, or otherwise track and archive the activities of the committee?

Yes.


3b) If you do keep minutes, where are they housed? Can other faculty (or administrators) not on your committee look at these minutes easily?

Minutes are kept for the committee and may be located in the Director of Facilities office.  Other faculty (or administrators) may have access to these minutes via email, phone request or by setting up an appointment.


4) Please add any additional comments on committee meetings and the time commitment required of faculty on this committee.

None.

Handbook Committee Self Study


Name of Committee:  Handbook Committee

Current Committee Members (please indicate chair and any other officers): 
Ellen Daugherty (Fall 2011 replacement for Joel Priddy)
Remy Miller
Haley Morris-Cafiero
Joel Priddy (Sabbatical Fall 2011)
Betty Spence
  

Part 1:  MCA Faculty Handbook Description

1) The 2011-2012 MCA Handbook includes the following description of the Committee:

NONE (see pp. E-9, E-10)


2a) In the opinion of the committee, does the handbook description accurately describe the function, purpose, and membership of the committee? Please explain.

N/A



2b) Please suggest changes/edits/rewrites for the Handbook description of your committee.  If the Handbook does not currently include a description for your committee, please write one. (Answers to this section of the self-study are suggestions only. They are intended to help the faculty move toward Handbook revisions, but they should be regarded as draft versions at this stage. Please don’t spend an inordinately long time trying to craft the perfect description—they can be changed and edited as we go through the process.)



The Handbook Committee is a standing faculty committee whose purpose is to review the MCA Faculty Handbook and suggest both editorial changes/corrections and policy revisions to the faculty and administration.  The Handbook Committee also accepts recommendations from the faculty and administration for handbook changes, and handles questions and problems that faculty or administrators may have regarding handbook policy.


Part 2:  Committee Charge, Duties, and Goals

1) Does the committee operate under a clearly stated committee “charge” (that is, a statement of purpose explaining what the committee is charged with doing on behalf of the faculty or college—this may be different from the catalog description of the committee)?  Is this charge written down and made available to the members of the committee and the college community at large?  Please explain. (If you feel that the current catalog description or any revision to the description that you made above functions adequately as a charge, please say so).

Currently, there is no charge.  A possible charge might be:

The Handbook Committee shall continually and consistently review the MCA Faculty Handbook (hereafter, Handbook) and shall recommend changes in the Handbook (including prose, organization, corrections of errors, and substantive policy changes) to the faculty and the administration. The Committee shall address questions, concerns, and recommendations from the faculty and administration regarding Handbook matters. The Committee shall use appropriate means to recommend and seek approval for changes to the Handbook, including the Policy on Policies. The Committee shall be responsible for the correct and timely publication of all changes to the Handbook. The Committee shall be responsible for archiving past iterations of the Handbook and for the prompt distribution of all revisions to the Handbook to the full faculty and administration.


2) Does the committee maintain a set of specific duties? Are these written down? If a set of such duties exists (written down or in the minds of the chair or other members of the committee), please list them here.  (In other words, what is the committee specifically responsible for? What does the committee do?)

No and No.  A proposed list of duties would include those enumerated in the proposed charge (above) and the following.

* The Committee shall report its proceedings to the faculty body in written minutes and periodic reports at faculty meetings.



3) Does the committee have a set of goals (short and/or long-term)? If so, please list them and briefly explain the process the committee used to arrive at these goals.

We discussed the following goals at our October 28, 2011 meeting:

1) To root out evil policies and recommend changes
2) To find mistakes and inconsistencies in the current Handbook and correct them
3) To improve the overall prose of the Handbook
4) To change the format of the current Handbook in order to improve its logic, its usability, and its professionalism


4) Other than verbal reports at faculty meetings, does the committee make reports in verbal or written form to the faculty or administration? How often are these reports made? Where are written reports housed and are they available to other members of the college community?

At faculty meetings.
Currently, there are no written reports, but we have begun keeping minutes. As yet, we do not know where these minutes will be housed other than on Ellen’s laptop.


5) Please add any additional comments about the charge, duties, and goals of the committee.


None
Part 3:  Committee Membership

1a) To the best of the committee’s knowledge, how are faculty members of the currently committee chosen?

The original committee was made up of volunteers who were then affirmed by the faculty.



1b) If it is not explicitly stated in the description/rules/by-laws of the committee, how do you think the members of the committee should be chosen?

It is the opinion of the members of this committee that, in general, this should be a voluntary committee with limited membership number.



2a) Do the faculty members on the committee have limited terms of service?

Not currently.



2b) If it is not explicitly stated in the description/rules/by-laws of the committee, should there be terms of service? Please explain.

The committee thinks that terms should be limited.  This committee should be one on which the entire faculty body serves at one time or another. By limiting terms of service, we will encourage the membership of the committee to change (new ideas, different opinions are healthy) and we will encourage a larger portion of the faculty to embrace ownership of the committee and the Handbook.   The committee also suggests that the membership of the committee be reviewed annually (not yet sure by what means). The chair of the committee should be a member who has served on the committee for at least one year already.  The goal is to always have a committee on which at least one person is a carry-over from the previous year—a sense of continuity and an understanding of past decisions can be maintained within the committee.


3) Does the current committee membership structure make sense? Is the committee too big, too small, the right size?  Please explain.

Currently, it is too big by 1 (if Ellen stays on in the Spring when Joel returns). The committee should be 4 people.


4a) Does the committee as it currently exists have faculty members from each of the Divisions of the College?  If so, do you feel (or is it a requirement of the committee) that it always have representation from each of the Divisions? 

Yes. Currently, we represent Fine Arts, Foundations, Liberal Studies, and Design Arts (when Joel returns from sabbatical).  It is the opinion of the committee that having representation from all Divisions of the College is important and desirable—so we recommend this as a specification of membership.



4b) If the Committee does not include members from each Division, should it? Please explain.

See above.



5a) If there are administrators on the committee (according to Dean Strickland’s committee grid), explain their role(s).

No administrators.


5b) If administrators are members of the committee, do you feel that their roles are necessary? In other words, does the committee feel that administrators should be members of the committee? Please explain.

No administrators should have any role on this committee.


6a) If there are staff members on the committee, explain their role(s).

N/A


6b) If staff are members of the committee, do you feel that their roles are necessary to the successful functioning of the committee?  Please explain.

N/A


7) To what extent are the decisions of your committee autonomous? In other words, do you make decisions that do not go to the full faculty for approval? Or do you make recommendations that then must be approved by the faculty or others?  Please explain.

We don’t really know, although most of the changes that we would recommend will have to be approved by the full faculty and may have to be introduced through the Policy on Policies procedures. So our autonomy is most likely limited.


8) Please add any additional comments related to membership, committee structure, the appointment or election of members, participation of non-faculty members, etc.


None


Part 4: Committee Meetings and Time Commitment

1a) On average, how many times per semester does your committee meet?  Please indicate if the number of meetings varies by semester and explain why.

This is a new committee.  We have had only one meeting, so these are uncharted waters.


1b) Is there a set meeting schedule (e.g., once monthly, bi-weekly, etc)?  If not, how does the committee determine if a meeting is necessary and who calls the meeting?

No set meeting schedule yet.  Currently, the Chair calls the meeting.

1c) If there is no set meeting schedule, do you think that there should be a set meeting schedule or a minimum number of meetings for your committee per semester? Please explain.

Yes, In theory, the work of this committee is ongoing and substantial. In order to make the committee meaningful, we should have frequent meetings, probably one per month.


1d) How long is the average meeting?

50 minutes (lunch hour)

2) In general, how many hours of commitment per semester does this committee require of members?

Unknown, but if the committee functions as it should, probably a lot.


3a) Does the committee take minutes, keep notes, or otherwise track and archive the activities of the committee?

Yes.


3b) If you do keep minutes, where are they housed? Can other faculty (or administrators) not on your committee look at these minutes easily?

Unknown at this moment. Currently, Ellen has the minutes but they have not been archived in an easily accessible place.


4) Please add any additional comments on committee meetings and the time commitment required of faculty on this committee.

None.